<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe helps search engines to handle Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.organicseo.in/2008/07/02/adobe-helps-search-engines-to-handle-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.organicseo.in/2008/07/02/adobe-helps-search-engines-to-handle-flash/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: services flash</title>
		<link>http://www.organicseo.in/2008/07/02/adobe-helps-search-engines-to-handle-flash/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>services flash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicseo.in/?p=89#comment-776</guid>
		<description>omg !! Best news ever. Time to reward people who try to make the net more artistic :) Thumbs up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg !! Best news ever. Time to reward people who try to make the net more artistic <img src='http://www.organicseo.in/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Thumbs up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aniroy1986</title>
		<link>http://www.organicseo.in/2008/07/02/adobe-helps-search-engines-to-handle-flash/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>aniroy1986</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicseo.in/?p=89#comment-559</guid>
		<description>Hamilton is right. flash sites r awesome! but in graphics not in speed :-)
but they do deserve a better placing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hamilton is right. flash sites r awesome! but in graphics not in speed <img src='http://www.organicseo.in/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
but they do deserve a better placing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamilton SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.organicseo.in/2008/07/02/adobe-helps-search-engines-to-handle-flash/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicseo.in/?p=89#comment-431</guid>
		<description>It's about time something gets done to help out flash websites. There are plenty of them that are awesome and would deserve more visibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time something gets done to help out flash websites. There are plenty of them that are awesome and would deserve more visibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long Beach Computer Services</title>
		<link>http://www.organicseo.in/2008/07/02/adobe-helps-search-engines-to-handle-flash/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Long Beach Computer Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicseo.in/?p=89#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Guys your leaving out a piece of the puzzel. They also announced that it only Reads WHAT IT SEE's to multi layer flash files will only index what it looks at. So they suggest and TAKE NOTES. Build Each Page as its OWN flash file. So home is YOURDOMAIN.com/HOME.HTML
your About goes to YOURDOMAIN.com/ABOUT.HTML with seperate flash files on each page. also try to just use flash in parts of the page. Try to keep SEO onpage and flash for the 'Jazz' of the site

-Have a good one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys your leaving out a piece of the puzzel. They also announced that it only Reads WHAT IT SEE&#8217;s to multi layer flash files will only index what it looks at. So they suggest and TAKE NOTES. Build Each Page as its OWN flash file. So home is YOURDOMAIN.com/HOME.HTML<br />
your About goes to YOURDOMAIN.com/ABOUT.HTML with seperate flash files on each page. also try to just use flash in parts of the page. Try to keep SEO onpage and flash for the &#8216;Jazz&#8217; of the site</p>
<p>-Have a good one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: worpress hacks</title>
		<link>http://www.organicseo.in/2008/07/02/adobe-helps-search-engines-to-handle-flash/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>worpress hacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicseo.in/?p=89#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Even I have heard that Adobe is working with search engines to enhance Flash searches. So all the search engines will be able to spider the flash content also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even I have heard that Adobe is working with search engines to enhance Flash searches. So all the search engines will be able to spider the flash content also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: برامج</title>
		<link>http://www.organicseo.in/2008/07/02/adobe-helps-search-engines-to-handle-flash/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>برامج</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicseo.in/?p=89#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Woow 
like i see "adobe" is the biggest of Flash,
YouTube all about flash "flv" ! 

thanks alot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woow<br />
like i see &#8220;adobe&#8221; is the biggest of Flash,<br />
YouTube all about flash &#8220;flv&#8221; ! </p>
<p>thanks alot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free proxy list</title>
		<link>http://www.organicseo.in/2008/07/02/adobe-helps-search-engines-to-handle-flash/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>free proxy list</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 04:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicseo.in/?p=89#comment-173</guid>
		<description>This is good news, but I think its going to take a while to make a difference for flash sites.  I wonder if the sites have to have used some proper tagging during the making of their flash site for the crawler to pick it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news, but I think its going to take a while to make a difference for flash sites.  I wonder if the sites have to have used some proper tagging during the making of their flash site for the crawler to pick it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
